![]() ![]() Experimental evaluations on the D-SAF approach show that it is able to robustly learn the underlying nonlinear model, with a significant gain compared with a noncooperative solution. The authors of this work derive a D-SAF by applying ideas from the DA framework, as explained in Chapter 9. įinally, as underlined in Section 3.3.5, the SAF approach has been recently extended to the diffusion case, involving a distributed (wireless) sensors network. Moreover, the proposed solution has been extended with additional refinements in and. In particular, in authors show the effectiveness of SAF approach to other state-of-the-art algorithms. The SAF approach has been successfully applied to NAEC in, where it is shown that the proposed solutions outperform other linear and nonlinear approaches.Īnother challenging scenario is the nonlinear adaptive noise cancellation (NANC) problem. However, SAFs have been used in applicative scenarios providing interesting and very good results.Ī first applicative scenario is the nonlinear acoustic echo cancellation (NAEC) problem. ![]() In the previous subsections, we provided some numerical results on the general problem of nonlinear system identification. Aurelio Uncini, in Adaptive Learning Methods for Nonlinear System Modeling, 2018 3.5.3 Applicative Scenarios The well-known recommendation within the industry is to limit the delays added by the network itself, wireless and wired, to 50ms on top of whatever the phones and PBXs add. Therefore, the 200ms of end-to-end budget can get eaten into rather quickly. Conference bridges or media gateways add an additional delay, starting at the packet size and going up from there. This can easily be up to a couple of packets worth. The receiver will add a significant amount of delay for its reassembly jitter buffer, mentioned in the next section. G.729 adds an extra 5ms of delay for its encoder, on top of the 20ms for the packet rate typically used. ![]() The sending encoder for a 20ms G.711 stream will add 20ms, necessarily, to the delay: the frame comes out with the first sample delayed by the entire 20ms. End-to-end delays are added to by the codecs. Most of this delay budget should be considered to belong to the wireline network. Toll quality becomes challenged when, all else being perfect, the delay begins to cross 300ms.īecause loss and delay are present in networks together, it is best to avoid delays that get up to 200ms. You may notice that the formula allows for up to 200ms of one-way, end-to-end delay, before any degradation is noticeable. Delay Impairment over Millisecondsĭelay impairment is measured independent of the codec, though the codec adds to the total delay. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |